Curated by a collective
BV PF AH WN ER CB FL MH MS JW SW MB IE IA LP RH JR MM
AM JB CW MK JL MT BL MG AS NR CL TB SM BZ KA GW JC

All submissions anonymous unless noted.
6th Mar 2013


The art world uses intimidation to achieve its authority.
- Intellectual intimidation (you’re not smart enough to enjoy art)- Financial intimidation (you’re not rich enough to enjoy art)
Without this authority art is too marginal compared to popular culture.
The art world is based on exclusivity, which means a large number of people should feel excluded.
The art market is very different from the mass market. Taste is centralized, a small community decides on what’s good and what’s bad. Collectors will invest in an artist and at a certain point it doesn’t matter if the artist makes good or bad work, the collectors have to protect their investment so they will continue to buy work by that artist.
Sometimes good art is praised, and sometimes bad art is praised just as much. A lot of people can’t really tell what they like in art, so they just assume if it gets good press it’s probably good.
Wether an artwork is good or not is very abstract. For most people Art is uninteresting, they don’t even bother. They’d rather see a movie.
The mass market is good for certain things, the elite market is good for other things.One is not better than the other, they both exist and that’s good.
(I realize that there are many many definitions of the word “Art”.In this blog post I’m talking about art shown in art fairs and museums)

- Rafaël Rozendaal, October 8th, 2012


The art world uses intimidation to achieve its authority.

- Intellectual intimidation (you’re not smart enough to enjoy art)
- Financial intimidation (you’re not rich enough to enjoy art)

Without this authority art is too marginal compared to popular culture.

The art world is based on exclusivity, which means a large number of people should feel excluded.

The art market is very different from the mass market. Taste is centralized, a small community decides on what’s good and what’s bad. Collectors will invest in an artist and at a certain point it doesn’t matter if the artist makes good or bad work, the collectors have to protect their investment so they will continue to buy work by that artist.

Sometimes good art is praised, and sometimes bad art is praised just as much. A lot of people can’t really tell what they like in art, so they just assume if it gets good press it’s probably good.

Wether an artwork is good or not is very abstract. For most people Art is uninteresting, they don’t even bother. They’d rather see a movie.

The mass market is good for certain things, the elite market is good for other things.
One is not better than the other, they both exist and that’s good.

(I realize that there are many many definitions of the word “Art”.
In this blog post I’m talking about art shown in art fairs and museums)

- Rafaël Rozendaal, October 8th, 2012

This post has 23 notes
  1. williamlmoore reblogged this from haunted-server-farm
  2. ianaleksanderadams reblogged this from altcrit
  3. unscupperedthings reblogged this from altcrit
  4. haunted-server-farm reblogged this from altcrit
  5. anxiouslollygagging reblogged this from altcrit and added:
    a v good point
  6. altcrit posted this